Re: [wg-review] [process] Bounced Messages and language issues

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 08:50 AM 1/18/01, Pilar Luque wrote:
>I will try to have it ready just before Melbourne.  I hope the work will
>lead the motion somewhere.

I was hoping for Monday, so we could begin discussing it promptly (either 
next week or when originally scheduled in the WG agenda). If we can, we 
might be able to come up with serious proposals for the Names Council in a 
manner that allows them to address these issues to the BoD. One of the 
problems that YJ has identified is that while work proceeds in English, 
"just in time" materials put tremendous burdens on those who need to 
translate the documents, and can lead both to misunderstandings and 
lower-quality decisions.

 > Could you (or someone else who volunteers, or together with someone) do us
> > a favor? It would be really helpful to have all the posts that have been
> > made to the WG about language issues summarized into one post. It could be
> > structured by problems, with suggested approaches to each problem grouped
> > under the problem.
> >
> > This would give us a standard frame of reference for our work here, and
> > would insure that we don't accidentally leave anything out. Are you willing
> > to help with this?

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html