Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF]

["Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>]

Ira,
I believe we are in agreement. My questions regarding coke.com and
drinkcoke.com were only to exemplify the complexity. I agree with your Red
Dog point. Avoiding unfair capture was within my stated objective

My suggestion for a common point of agreement stands:
"what is important is the intent of the domain name holder. Are they in good
faith or bad faith? Do they seek fair DNS presence or do they seek to
pretend to be what they are not?"

Let's first agree to this objective before we explore strategies to reach
it.

Philip





--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html