Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH Centers of Interest

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

It is a must to define domain and determine the rights conferred in the registration
process.  There are no less than 100 well reasoned court opinions on property vs.
service rights and all of them come up with different conclusions.  This wg can
define them.  And even if the BoD does not like the definition, I am convinved that
this brain trust will have such sound reasoning that the definition will survive.

Sincerely,

DPF wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:31:42 +0100, Robin Miller wrote:
>
> >> The 200 odd members of the CA/IDNO support the term owners.
> >
> >I don't support the term. I guess that makes it 199 odd members. I remember not
> >being alone in my opinion. So strike a few more from the 199.
>
> For the record I prefer the term holder to owner also (and am a member
> of IDNO).  Domain Names are not sold by registries because if they
> were that would imply registries owned the names in the first place
> before selling them.
>
> DPF
> ________________________________________________________________________
> <david at farrar dot com>
> NZ Usenet FAQs - http://www.dpf.ac.nz/usenet/nz
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Emanuel.exe