Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

I apologize for the mistake, although on further review it may be a combination
of the 75.5% and the 14.2% or 89.9%.  I wonder about this though, as most 1-4
employee businesses are sole proprietors, and the name would be held by
individuals anyhow. I speculate that only about 10% of the names are actually
in use. This is not for argument but just for clarity of thought, and my
thought is only rough.

Sincerely,

Judith Oppenheimer wrote:

> For clarity's sake, particularly if you are going to use my name, the
> relevant statistic is that 75.5% of domain registrants are SMALL businesses
> of BETWEEN ONE AND FOUR EMPLOYEES.
>
> Judith
>
> http://www.ICBTollFreeNews.com
> "An important source of inside information," says InfoWorld;
> "superb", "invaluable", "critically intelligent", "exceedingly
> useful", report ICB Premium Subscribers.
> ICB Premium Service is On Sale thru January 15.
> http://www.icbtollfree.com/Article4910.htm
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Eric Dierker
> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:29 PM
> > To: Kent Crispin
> > Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC,
> > TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your response.  The debate yesterday regarding
> > adhesion contracts
> > and registrars and TMs would be a point of argument regarding
> > being very careful
> > not to violate.  Microsofts failed defense of the justice
> > departments attack upon
> > it would be another point of argument here.  And I think we
> > could agree that ICANN
> > is not in competition with anyone, although the alternative
> > root servers may argue
> > this point.
> >
> > So it would appear that while coming from different angles we
> > agree that a larger
> > constituent base would be a very good idea for ICANN,
> > assuming that we are trying
> > to fix the structure as opposed to replacing it.
> >
> > Looking again at the organizational chart I think several
> > more constituencies
> > would not hurt at all.  Once again this could be done simply
> > by creating interest
> > blocks in the GA and increasing the percentage of directors
> > flowing therefrom.
> >
> > This has to be done in conjunction with Ms. Merry's
> > suggestions which will
> > increase the participation level, of Ms. Oppenheimers 85%, a
> > clear majority above
> > the 67% as set forth in the metamorphising definition of consensus.
> >
> > So moving in this direction we are formulating Charter
> > corrections even while
> > working within the existing charter. Please heed the
> > intelligence of the recent
> > suggestion not to get bogged down in semantics, I do not
> > stand by any rigid
> > definition at this point.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:09:15AM -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
> > > > Mr. Crispin,
> > > > This is a very nice insight into the truth of the monopoly matter.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > >  But it is
> > > > also true that it will only continue to exist if it does
> > not cause a problem
> > > > that anti-trust laws are designed to prohibit.
> > >
> > > Quite true.
> > >
> > > > ICANN is doing that right now
> > >
> > > No, it's not.  If there is anything that ICANN has been very careful
> > > about, it is avoiding antitrust.  It has been, as I said, a primary
> > > concern from the very beginning.
> > >
> > > > and if it does not get fixed from the inside I am certain
> > it will get fixed
> > > > from the outside. So we had better get busy and get the
> > people or entities
> > > > affected by ICANN into the decision making process.
> > >
> > > In general, getting affected entities involved in the
> > decision making
> > > process is not at all necessary to avoid anti-trust.  For
> > example, we
> > > don't deal with Microsoft by holding at large elections for
> > the board of
> > > directors of Microsoft.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> > > kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Emanuel.exe