RE: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

No problema wrt 2300hrs, any day. As you can see from previous post, I
usually keep programmers-hours.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:31 AM
> To: Greg Burton; rmeyer@mhsc.com; yjpark@myepark.com
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
> 
> 
> Greg,
> This is definitely an improvement except for the Australian/ 
> NZ time zone.
> That's 2pm (1400) GMT Tuesday, which is 9am (0900) East Coast 
> USA Tuesday,
> 6am (0600) West Coast USA and 11pm (2300) Wednesday 
> Australia. We're not
> going to hear from Joop or David in the next few hours 
> because it's now
> 3.30am in Australia, but does this suit Roeland?
> Joanna
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Greg Burton
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:17 PM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Cc: Ken Stubbs; YJ Park MINC"; board@minc.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
> 
> 
> At 08:52 AM 1/22/01, YJ Park wrote:
> >1st, regarding the agenda 8. I just mainly used Greg's, co-chair of
> >this group, suggested agenda distributed on Dec. 18 in this list.
> 
> Hi, YJ.
> 
>   The agenda I had for the teleconference was as included in 
> the notice:
> 
> >==================================
> >                WG-Review Teleconference
> >==================================
> >Date: 2001. 1. 23. Tuesday. 4:00 AM. GMT
> >Participants: WG-Review Members
> >Agenda: schedule, work plans for next period, updates on 
> status of items
> 
> It certainly didn't include the rest of the material you listed.
> 
>  > i cannot agree with your selection of the time for the 
> call. the time of
> the
> > > day scheduled  does not appear to de designed AT ALL to 
> encourage any
> > > participation from most of  Latin America, Europe & the USA.
> >
> >2nd, regarding time proposal, I suggested as follows 9:00 
> eastern time
> >initially
> >and then Greg is supposed to handle this as co-chair. 
> Finally he announced
> >4:00 GMT which I personally have no idea where it came from however,
> 
> Actually, this was a mistake, due to a bad time conversion on 
> my part (I
> went the wrong direction). I've been out of town for 3 days and out of
> touch. I have no problem with a rescheduled time, perhaps back to the
> 2:00pm GMT time I should have converted to in the first place.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Greg
> 
> sidna@feedwriter.com
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html