RE: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Multilingulaism in ICANN

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Mr. Conant,
In case you haven't noticed, there was a change of government in the USA
over the weekend and you are making a serious mistake to think the Bush
Cheney administration is going to go along with Clinton Gore policies,
whatever they may or may not be. Your statement has no merit IMHO.
Joanna

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Derek Conant
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Per Koelle
Cc: Pilar Luque; wg-review@dnso.org; cctld-discuss@wwtld.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Multilingulaism in ICANN


ccTLD representatives and other international representatives with all of
their resources, opinions and frustration towards ICANN and its policy
appear
to not participate with organizations that have demonstrated energy, power
and directives toward serving a better DNS.

Nothing will induce more change than a competitive organization that has the
ability and resources to propose productive change and that will not
compromise its constituencies, through legislation and through other
effective communication channels within the US Government.

ICANN serves only the US Government.  Make no mistake about that.  It
appears
to me that any topic of discussion here, or any seemingly productive
direction or result of such topic, will only move forward if it fits the US
Government's current and future plan for the Internet.  I cannot see that
participants here (whether they know it or not) are doing anything more than
playing out the US Government's plan of furthering US global control over
the
Internet.  Through my experience, I know that participants here are not
going
to convince a US quasi-government agency (ICANN) of any change unless you
can
show that it will first benefit the US Government's plan to maintain US
global control over the Internet.

I hope that this will help make your discussions regarding the subject
matter
more efficient.

Derek Conant


Per Koelle wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Pilar Luque wrote:
>
> > Daer all,
> >
> >
> > 8. Multilingualism should be a point to be considered in the new Names
> > Council Budget and Names Council Business Plan.
>
> No way should we (ccTLD's) pay for this through another body (the NC) !
>
> We pay enough directly to ICANN. To me, it makes a lot more sense to do
> some translation on crucial papers, than spend money on web-casting for
> maybe up to fifty (50) people during meetings. (Not to mention what has
> been spend on (US) layers regarding gTLD-matters.)
>
> Regards
> Per Koelle
> .DK
>
> > THEREFORE IT SHOULD BE DECIDED:
> >
> > 1. BUSINESS PLAN FOR SLOWLY INTRODUCING MULTILINGUALISM IN THE WHOLE OF
> > THE ICANN PROCESS
> > 2. STUDY OF THE BUDGET REQUIRED
> > 3. WHICH LANGUAGES SHOULD BE INTRODUCED
> >
> >
> > Comments please.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Pilar LUQUE (ES-NIC)
> > --
> > ccTLD Constituency of the DNSO
> > Discussion Mailing list
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html