ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] [TELECON] Disappointment.


I do not think that the teleconference idea was a bad idea, however, I
was
beginning to wonder when someone here would mention disappointment in
the
scheduling of the teleconference.  In reviewing the teleconference
related
communication, it appeared to me that there was no focus, whatsoever,
regarding
the teleconference.

I was also wondering what the parties here were going to discuss during
the
teleconference while subject matters have yet to be worked out through
the email
process.

I suggest that matters be discussed via email until there is an agenda
and until
certain subject matters are crystallized.  Then hold a teleconference.

Let's continue to discuss matters here via email and let's get back to
business
here so that I may accurately relay such information to the US Senators
I am
working with on proposing reform of DoC policy and ICANN.

Derek Conant


Sotiropoulos wrote:

> I tried getting a line through some of the discount long-distance avenues
> available.  Net2phone was having server troubles and I couldn't establish an
> account, 1010620 & 1015945 resulted only in busy signals, and Bell Canada
> wanted $1.37 /minute to put me through to Singapore. Through the last hour
> and a half, I have tried to get a reasonably affordable line into the
> teleconference, without success.  So... I just gave up!
>
> To be frank, if I have to absorb long-distance costs to share my ideas with
> the WG via teleconference, then so much for a "bottom-up" approach.  I
> think "bottoms-up" is *much* more appropriate.  My participation in the WG-
> Review has already resulted in some considerable expenditure of my time,
> resources, and energies.
>
> I wish to state, for the record, that I found this entire teleconference
> *experience* to be quite an ill-conceived, hurried, and badly executed
> exercise on the whole.  I am seriously disappointed.
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>