RE: Legal Question - Re: [wg-review] Concerns

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Derek Conant wrote:-
<snip>
<I do not know if Joanna is being sarcastic here toward me because of
certain
communication I have seen from her directed at me in the past  (I probably
deserved those comments in the past, I don't know). >

-  My comment was sincere. It would serve no purpose to be otherwise.
However, I do appreciate that it can be difficult to fully understand the
tone of a stranger's letter without the voice behind the words, which is why
I am careful NOT to use sarcasm in my posts. Sarcasm can be misunderstood
very easily and it's not very clever for a person, who is trying to be
direct and clear in what they are saying, to use a style that sends mixed
messages. So let me assure you that the most you will ever hear from me in
that department would be a "Yeah right" or "Uh huh", which I may use from
time to time if I don't believe a word that's being said.
Regards,
Joanna


<I was pleased to
receive Mr. Dierker's comment replies, they appear measured and just right.>
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg02118.html
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg02124.html
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg02125.html

Mr. Sotiropoulos also deserves credit here because he appears willing to
contribute his opinions regarding the matters on discussion here and he
appears to
not be persuaded by rhetoric that is non-productive and inefficient for the
DNS
and commerce.

Derek Conant


Sotiropoulos wrote:

> 1/25/01 9:39:58 PM, "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com> wrote:
>
> >Eric,
> >Excellent. This is a brilliant example of how it is possible to meet the
> >challenge of putting ideas forward in an effective format IMHO. All it
needs
> >now is some documentary evidence (URLS) to establish a foundation for
> the
> >claims it makes. Then we can use it.
> >Regards,
> >Joanna
>
> Joana & Eric,
>
> I've got a few URLs for you:  CORINTHIANS.COM, MADONNA.COM,
> BARCELONA.COM...  And the list goes on and on...
>
> Let's have the snide remark now, I've consigned myself to such rejoinders.
> Seems anything of substance any of us might have to offer is brushed aside
> or ignored anyway.  How about a surprise for a change?
>
> (Considering that we're here trying to give substance to, and make some
> sense of, the undefined terms that are raining down from on high... I
think we
> should be accorded a little more respect.  Let's face it, most of us have
> pretty thick skins... which is not to say the same for our skulls.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html