[wg-review] Fw: [nc-review] Draft DNSO Review report, version 2.0

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

FYI,

I do hope WG-Review can fill up the blanks instead of too much
burden to secretariat all the time.:-)

Thanks,
YJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
To: "Nc-Review" <nc-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: [nc-review] Draft DNSO Review report, version 2.0


> Task Force Members,
>
> Please find attached the revised DNSO Review Task Force Report for your
> review. I apologize for not getting the version 2.0 to the Task Force
> earlier. You'll note that revisions in version 2.0 are based on NC Jan.
24th
> conference call, subsequent comments received, and per NC vote, inclusion
of
> listing of issues polled in the Working Group (mainly inclusion of
footnotes
> and links to comments/discussions, annex of issues polled in the Working
> Group). You'll see that the recommendations are in italiques, as they are
in
> draft and only suggestions for further comment.
>
> You'll note there are some footnotes and areas that need filling in, and
> where with some the assistance of the secretariat would be most
appreciated.
> However, in the interest of getting the revised draft to the Task Force
b/f
> going to the DNSO public comment time, the draft is sent to this list now
> (the typo's will be corrected, of course :-)).
>
> According the schedule discussed on the NC call, and distributed earlier,
> the draft Task Force DNSO Review Report will be posted for Dnso public
> comment.
>
> Theresa
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theresa Swinehart [mailto:Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:36 PM
> To: 'nc-review@dnso.org'
> Cc: 'names council'
> Subject: Draft DNSO Review report, version 1.0
>
>
> All,
>
> First, I apologize for the delay in getting this to the Review Task Force.
> Aside from the enormous numbers of substantive comments, an unanticipated
> change in my own travel schedule caused some slight delays.
>
> Attached is the first draft for the Task Force review. The report is not
> intended to be complete, it is a  draft for input by the other task force
> members. Please also note that there are citations still to be filled in,
> and blanks to be filled, including recommendations. If any comments
> submitted to the Task Force by individuals, constituencies, or members of
> constituencies, have not been listed, please note so they can be added to
> the report. Under some recommendations, thoughts on recommendations have
> been added, but there are merely thoughts, and in no way final, but rather
> for discussion in the Task Force and the Names Council call.
>
> Please also note there is no pride in authorship here (and there will be
> some grammar editing/etc. to better streamline any more final product :-)
> and once comments have been incorporated). This is a  preliminary draft
for
> your input as Task Force members. Please note that we have a very short
turn
> around due to the extensions resulting from the Working Group. Therefore,
> input is sought, and the draft will also be forwarded soon to the Names
> Council conference call to allow NC members a chance to read b/f the call
on
> the 24th.
>
> Thank you to all who provided comment and input. Thank you in advance.
>
> Theresa
>
>
>

tfreview-2.0.doc