Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion
In an earlier post
Greg has written, “Because the IDNH question has been broken out and the motion
passed by this WG to create a working group on the topic has been presented to
the NC, I believe it would be more fruitful at this time to leave this out of
the discussion”. If the NC has
acted favorably upon the motion, I would agree; please advise – has the NC
taken any action in this regard?
If not, may we proceed to discussion of IDNH?
|