<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion
You are finding much more civil and therefore probably useful ways to ask my
questions than I, Danny. Thank you.
/R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion
> Regarding the Review Task Force questionnaire (a portion of which dealt
with
> constituencies), would it be possible to examine the responses submitted?
I
> am aware that the DNSO Review Report has indicated that "large numbers of
> comments were received", but I cannot find more than a few actually cited
in
> the document. Where are all the other ones?
>
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|