<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] remuneration/confirmation
1/29/01 3:22:39 PM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:
>(As for the remuneration question... at least now we know that Roeland,
>yourself, and myself, are not being payed
>to be here.)
>
>- Please add my name to the list of those who are giving up their own
>time
>to be here, are not paid and are out of pocket.
>My teleconference bill was USD $30.00.
>Joanna
>
>I can't believe these statements, I for one am being paid by the
>satisfaction of working with such fine members of the international
>internet community and of knowing the great work which is being
>accomplished.
Frankly Eric, I can't believe yours! What "great work" exactly? And if it's work,
where's the payment? You may be satisfied with what's been/being done here,
and what you're getting out of it, but you are speaking only for yourself. BTW,
I'm truly touched by your sentiment (the "fine members of the int'l internet community" bit).
However, since we're going to go this route, let me be blunt: If *anybody* is being
paid or remunerated to be here, then I don't see why it shouldn't apply to *everyone*.
(Oh, and I almost forgot to ask... since you weren't totally clear in your response: Are you being
remunerated *financially* for your participation in this WG, Eric?
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|