Re: [wg-review] 3.Constituencies - RTF Report
At 08:29 PM 1/29/01, Joanna Lane wrote: If it is decided that this WG needs to refute specific allegations, disassociate itself with certain statements and clarify possible misunderstandings, it could do so by posting to the public forum before Feb 11th. It should be noted that archives do exist for the review comments list, however they're not listed on the "all archives" page of the dnso.org site. They can be found at http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-review/Arc00/ . I'm still somewhat bemused by the announcement: "Please note that the comment-review@dnso.org list is completely open and as such subject to spams. All comments sent are approved manualy, therefore delayed." since I can't recall anyone else calling a moderated list "completely open" before. It's heartening that the first substantive comments on the report were posted by members of the WG. Greg sidna@feedwriter.com
|