Re: [wg-review] 3.Constituencies - RTF Report

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Sotiropoulos wrote:

> <snip> Did  I do that right?
> I concur absolutely.  (But what happened with the Federal Reserve?  that's not very "Federal" you know...)
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.

Actually your Federal concept has agreat deal of merit.  Suppose we make our constituencies like the U.S.A. states, two
senators from each state, any territory can petition to be a state.(constituency Group) This forms a senate.(DNSO)  Then
based upon mere population we have popular elections for the House (GA). Wait a second, isn't that what we are proposing.
Something sure looks, smells and acts like a governing body.

Sincerely,

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html