ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] RE:Voters should indicate if they voted


If acceptable I second with the caveat that she not be required to identify.

Phil King wrote:

> Ok, I don't see a motion, and this looks like it could resolve some
> repetative questions.
>
> from Joop:  <snip>
>
> For future votes, it is perfectly possible for all voters to indicate THAT
> they voted, without indicating how they voted.
> All they need to do is enter their name on the comment line.
>
> The list of names will appear in the results under "comments".
>
> Whether the listmembers will want this, is another question.
> First, a motion has to made to the Chair and if the motion is opposed, the
> issue would have to be voted on.
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --<snip>
>
> I move that a voting record of participants only, not how any person voted,
> but that she did vote, be taken from the name submission at the end of the
> voting page in the comments window.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
> Phil King
> Butte America
> (The Richest Hill On Earth)
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>