RE: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I would almost agree, but we are talking about opinion polls here. Let's not
elevate them to the level of "votes". Also, none of us have been elected to
this WG, therefore, we don't have the personal transparency requirement,
IMHO, that the ICANN BoD has.

The down-side to such lists, as I have seen in other efforts, is that they
are used as target acquisition lists by witch-hunters and spamsters, of
various flavors. This is especially pertinent since the identifier is the
voters email address. Be careful of what you ask for, you might not get what
you expect.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 10:09 AM
> To: Roeland Meyer; 'FRupp@aol.com'; wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!
> 
> 
> 1/31/01 9:29:01 AM, Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com> wrote:
>     
> >   If you think about is, that argument is as ugly as it 
> gets. It is the same
> >   argument that anti-privacy advocates use for their cause. 
> Using that
> >   argument, unltimately, requires us all to walk around 
> without clothes,
> >   just to prove that we have nothing to hide.
> 
> People who live in glass houses should dress in the basement. 
>  Privacy is for your bedroom and
> bank account.   I don't have a problem with COMPLETE 
> TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY
> when it comes to such PUBLIC matters.
>  
> 
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc. 
> 
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html