ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] RE:Voters should indicate if they voted


I withdraw my second and suggest that it be known that you can identify
yourself in this way if you so chose.  As for polling it may be beneficial for
demographics and the like.  As for transparency it gives more insight into the
totals.  As for rights of privacy I am against anything that will tend to limit
participation in this group. (for instance I was pleased to hear from Mr.
Gluza) As a practical matter those of us who actually go ahead and shamefully
advocate a position can't help but make a comment and so you can tell who we
are anyhow.

conciliatorily,

bukko wrote:

> What is the reason for publicising info on who voted?
> If there is a valid reason this needs to come out, as I have yet to see it.
>
> bukko
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Joanna Lane
> Sent: 31 January 2001 17:41
> To: Phil King
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] RE:Voters should indicate if they voted
>
> I would object to this motion. While the electoral register is a matter of
> public interest, whether or not I voted is a private matter between me and
> my conscience. Anyway, voted on what? Some people may have voted
> selectively.
> Joanna
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Phil King
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:35 AM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-review] RE:Voters should indicate if they voted
>
> Ok, I don't see a motion, and this looks like it could resolve some
> repetative questions.
>
> from Joop:  <snip>
>
> For future votes, it is perfectly possible for all voters to indicate THAT
> they voted, without indicating how they voted.
> All they need to do is enter their name on the comment line.
>
> The list of names will appear in the results under "comments".
>
> Whether the listmembers will want this, is another question.
> First, a motion has to made to the Chair and if the motion is opposed, the
> issue would have to be voted on.
>
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>
> --<snip>
>
> I move that a voting record of participants only, not how any person voted,
> but that she did vote, be taken from the name submission at the end of the
> voting page in the comments window.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
> Phil King
> Butte America
> (The Richest Hill On Earth)
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Send a cool gift with your E-Card
> http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>