Re: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO Constituencies. - Dassa.

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/31/01 11:54:20 AM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:

>I think that Dassa's submission should be sent along as just what it is a proposal for the beginning of real progress 
>toward building the constituencies.  The comments regarding it should also be sent along and encouraged.  I 
>would like to see a reduction in the required numbers, a one-year grandfathering clause, and a revamping of the 
>layers toward a more direct cause and effect election type model.

I strongly disagree.  I think Dassa's report should be sent along by Dassa and not necessarily the WG.  Remember, 
the clear majority in the WG voted *against* constituencies allltogether, any other comments are *subsidiary*
and should be treated as such.  If dassa wishes to submit his suggestion as an indicidual, that's his prerogative, but 
the WG should not endorse it.

Sincerely,



Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html