RE: Delegate Ourselves - [wg-review] Re: Voters should indicate t hey voted!

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 11:05 AM 2/1/01, Cindy Merry wrote:
>Hey can all of you get off your high horses and stop poking at each other?
>You're wasting my e-mail space and cycling down into a ridiculous state.
>... Frankly, the politics of the personal is unnecessary as EVERYONE
>who submits has something of value we can add to this working groups'
>representation of all viewpoints.

Thank you, Cindy.

This actually all relates to the General Assembly topic, in a kind of 
backwards way. In the last couple of days, several people in the GA have 
commented agreed with Makael Pawlo that

"I think a lot of interested parties - like yours truly - got tired of the 
konstant rants and raves and ramblings on the GA mailinglist. The most 
important assignment for a new GA chair should - in my humble opinion - be 
to set the GA straight again
  and make it free from so called "trolls".

The GA list monitor has the ability to ban posts from someone for varying 
lengths of time, depending on the level of rules violation,  or to simply 
manually approve posts instead of having them post immediately. The chair 
can also declare a maximum number of posts per day that are allowed per person.

Inside this Working Group, Roeland Meyer suggested that another way to cut 
down on the mail flood would be to use a news server, instead of a mailing 
list.

In general, how do people feel about the solution of having a chair with 
that kind of power?
Would a technological solution (ie news server or webboard) be a better 
solution?
Should they be combined?


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html