[wg-review] Re: Immediate vote on voting - respond plese

[Derek Conant - DNSGA <dconant@dnsga.org>]

Thank you Mr. Burton.

It would be reasonable to expect that WG participants here can suggest how to
advance or better the voting process here within the 24 hours delegated to the
matter.

Also, it would be reasonable to expect that participants here may change their
minds concerning how they voted before the close of the 24 hours delegated to the
matter.

We have 24 hours people.  Let's fix this voting problem and set an example that
we can accomplish this.

Derek Conant


Greg Burton wrote:

> At 10:30 AM 2/1/01, Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>
> The question is here:
>
> >Does anyone in this WG agree that this WG should quickly address and fix its
> >voting process?
> >
> >Yes or No?
>
> Please reply on this thread with either "yes" or "no". I believe that
> sufficient bandwidth has already been expended on discussion of the question.
>
> Since Mr Conant doesn't like the existing system, and thinks that 24 hours
> is sufficient time for leaving a vote open (as opposed to the 5 days we're
> currently operating under), the vote will close 24 hours from the time of
> his question, and will occur publicly on this thread . If a majority of
> respondents agree with Mr Conant, we will reopen the question. If a
> majority disagree, I expect Mr Conant to cease his agitation on this matter
> immediately upon the conclusion of the period.
>
> Currently, I tally:
>
> For:
> Derek Conant
>
> Opposed:
> bukko
> Greg Burton
>
> Regards,
> Greg
> working chair
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html