Re: [wg-review] Re: Immediate vote on voting - respond plese

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

Eric, this may have been answered in the day between my reading and it's
posting.  I see no mystery with the fact that this came up when it did. 
This is so far the most successfull slowdown of productive discussion in
terms of time wasted since I've been on the list (24 Dec).  I don't know if
it is the specific subject we want to review, GA, or just cut our output, or
our credibility.  Machs Nicht, there is a little discussion but it's in the
background, and hard to keep track of.  (and I wax verbose, again!)  Phil in
Butte!
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 13:36:00 -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:

>  Is there any reason that this subject has come up during the time
delegated for the
>  GA.  I would say this is a feint.  See http://www.bitshift.org/rror.shtml
and the
>  schedule placed upon http://www.internetstakeholders.com/.
>  
>  Sincerely,
>  
>  Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>  
>  > Thank you Mr. Burton.
>  >
>  > It would be reasonable to expect that WG participants here can suggest
how to
>  > advance or better the voting process here within the 24 hours delegated
to the
>  > matter.
>  >
>  > Also, it would be reasonable to expect that participants here may
change their
>  > minds concerning how they voted before the close of the 24 hours
delegated to the
>  > matter.
>  >
>  > We have 24 hours people.  Let's fix this voting problem and set an
example that
>  > we can accomplish this.
>  >
>  > Derek Conant
>  >
>  > Greg Burton wrote:
>  >
>  > > At 10:30 AM 2/1/01, Derek Conant - DNSGA wrote:
>  > >
>  > > The question is here:
>  > >
>  > > >Does anyone in this WG agree that this WG should quickly address and
fix its
>  > > >voting process?
>  > > >
>  > > >Yes or No?
>  > >
>  > > Please reply on this thread with either "yes" or "no". I believe that
>  > > sufficient bandwidth has already been expended on discussion of the
question.
>  > >
>  > > Since Mr Conant doesn't like the existing system, and thinks that 24
hours
>  > > is sufficient time for leaving a vote open (as opposed to the 5 days
we're
>  > > currently operating under), the vote will close 24 hours from the
time of
>  > > his question, and will occur publicly on this thread . If a majority
of
>  > > respondents agree with Mr Conant, we will reopen the question. If a
>  > > majority disagree, I expect Mr Conant to cease his agitation on this
matter
>  > > immediately upon the conclusion of the period.
>  > >
>  > > Currently, I tally:
>  > >
>  > > For:
>  > > Derek Conant
>  > >
>  > > Opposed:
>  > > bukko
>  > > Greg Burton
>  > >
>  > > Regards,
>  > > Greg
>  > > working chair
>  > >
>  > > sidna@feedwriter.com
>  >
>  > --
>  > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  
>  --
>  This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html