Re: [wg-review] Proposal to Restructure the DNSO

[Eric Dierker <Eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

If the existing consensus is that the whole of ICANN is to be a
representative body of the ICW and act  like a governing body, then this
proposal is the logical beginning of the conclusion.

Sincerely,

"Babybows.com" wrote:

> In keeping with the sentiment expressed by many that the Constituency
> model needs to be abandoned in favor of a structure that guards
> against the possibility of disenfranchising any group of interested
> parties, and in keeping with the terms of reference of the Review
> Working Group “to vindicate that DNSO would be a structure that will
> include all of those who will be affected by the DNS of the future as
> well as the current Netizens,” I am offering the following “Proposal
> to Restructure the DNSO” as an outline/ starting point for discussions
> (in the context of this current assessment of the GA by the members of
> the Review Working Group).
> 1.The Assembly shall elect its own Chair
>
> 2.The Assembly shall convene a Council consisting of 19 members
>
> 3.Each current Constituency (as a legacy consideration) shall appoint
> one member to this Council
>
> 4.Remaining seats to be filled by election
>
> 5.No one Constituency shall at any time have more than three members
> represented on the Council
>
> 6.The Assembly will consider policy initiatives
>
> 7.Upon decision of the Assembly Chair, working groups, committees or
> other such bodies shall be created to thoroughly prepare a policy
> recommendation
>
> 8.Such final recommendations are to be forwarded to the Council
> subsequent to a majority Assembly vote
>
> 9.The Council will review each such policy recommendation to determine
> whether such document meets the criteria of a “consensus policy”.
>
> 10.The Council will make such refinements as necessary
>
> 11.If adopted by the Council with a 2/3 vote, the policy will be
> forwarded to the Board; if not, it will be remanded to the Assembly
> for further work
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html