Re: [wg-review] Re: dndef, 9

["Miles B. Whitener" <mbw@i-theta.com>]

A sad outcome of judicial activism.
It seems to me that an ordered transfer can't generally interfere
with the rights of the registrar.  So a permanent transfer would
have to be interpreted to mean "as long as the transferee
maintains the domain".
The registrar in this case would have to delete the domain, else
could be sued for unfair treatment (deleting other domains when
payment is not made).


From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> I think Eric means what happens if a registrant, having been
awarded the
> name permanently, then declines to make any payments. The
registrars cannot
> force the domain name holder to pay in perpetuity, but equally,
cannot
> resell the name.
> Joanna

> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org
[mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Miles B. Whitener
> > The Judge got the property right but those poor registrars.
> How can they charge
> > for renewals if the judge orders it permanently transferred?
>
> When you transfer a domain, the new domain holder pays renewal
> charges.
> Haven't you ever transferred a domain?


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html