ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz


Title:
Miles,
Thank you again for clarifying. I realize I am not talking about distribution in terms of publishers, but in terms of the end user as audience, the recipient of the services. In the case of Yahoo and Nazi memorabilia, they banned all auctions globally as the only way to comply with the French Court Order to restrict access to specific territories where auction trading breached national law. I understand that if there had been a technical opportunity to enforce a subdivision of global distribution, they would have done it and they did not.
 
In media, the location where the product is created is relevant only in terms of tax planning. In all other respects the entertainment industry is global by nature. Elements of the movies showing at your local theatre will have originated in any number of countries and the jurisdiction of the production company does not dictate the nationality of the picture for tax purposes. The income stream derived from the product, "the content", comes from its exploitation and traditionally, it relies on pre-sales of distribution rights sold on a territory basis, usually in a phased release, to suit local social, political and economical conditions. The internet forces the issue a step further in that internet rights can only be sold on a global basis and small players simply do not have the experience or the resources to cope.
 
The point is that now is not the time for DNSO to abandon stakeholders and the creative and publishing components of an Internet Domain Name is an issue connected with $billions a year in revenue for the big Hollywood players. Think Harry Potter (currently 455 web sites excluding merchandising sites).
 
All I am asking for is an acknowledgement that Creative and Publishing components are considered as part of IDNDEF. I am not suggesting that DN Management take direct responsibility for administration.
 
Joanna
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Miles B. Whitener
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 4:21 PM
To: jo-uk@rcn.com
Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz

DNS can very well operate by territory.
 
If the root zone owner delegates the UK TLD to the United Kingdom, then the controller of geographical territory is the controller of a domain!  Very simple.
 
There already exist plenty of laws about use of names -- the Internet, and specifically the DNS is just another publishing/advertising means.>
 
IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but I would rather say DNS is an unique means of distribution that cannot operate by territory, only on a global scale. 
 
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>