Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF] short quizz 9,10

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:31:46AM +0000, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> Now, the problem is the UDRP can apply to many things (actually
> to everything which is defined in the dictionnary) but not to the DNs.
> Because DNs are not defined in the dirctionnary and not defined
> ine the UDRP (while some other words are).

You don't need to have a definition of the word "grass" in order to 
mow a lawn.  In fact, I'm quite sure that people of all linguistic
persuasions can run a lawn mower, without having to worry even that they
all have a common understanding of what the word "grass" means.  It is 
quite common, even in the law, for things to simply be defined through 
operation and familiarity.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html