Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 05:38 AM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>Mr. Chair,
>
>In other words, are you prepared to continue with the mandate
>granted you by the majority of the the voting
>members of the WGr, to complete the task you
>originally took to hand?

Of course. I'm quite perplexed as to why you seem to think that not posting 
to this list for two days is abandonment. I'm also perplexed as to why 
there were so few posts about General Assembly questions, and none about 
the Names council questions. I'm perplexed as to why so few people posted 
comments on the task force report, too. As to the status of the WG, we're 
still operating, if there are people left who have something to say on the 
topics.

Off list, several members of the WG have expressed concern in the last 
couple of days about votes. Their concern has been based on appearance is 
that there are so few members left that any vote will simply be waved off 
as unrepresentative. The suggestion has been made that we simply try to 
summarize material, and incorporate minority opinions on the summaries into 
the report.

Any comments?

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html