<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.
I'd like to answer, but first:
Without resorting to any acronyms or other documents:
What's the work of WG-Review?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
To: "Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
Cc: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.
>
>
> How many people have unsubscribed, is there a figure available?
>
> TO ALL: Is there anybody left on this ML. Please respond with
a simple YES
> if
> you are still interested in the "work" of the WG-Review.
>
> YES
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|