Re: [wg-review] 4,5,6, WGs, Standardized Procedures & Education

[Phil King <yofelipe@excite.com>]

Eric, I hope you're not surprized.  It falls right in line with the "study"
of the @Large Membership

Phil King in Butte  MT

On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:33:36 -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:

>  Recommendation: By Ms. Swinehart
>  
>  "to establish a study to identify specific core issues that need to be
>  addressed in order to determine if and how to establish an individual
>  domain name holders constituency."
>  
>  This working group and the review task force basically concluded that a
>  IDNH's constituency should be formed.  The above language is how to
>  "kill a bill in committee".  It takes our recommendation and puts it
>  into an ill defined study to find what needs to be addressed, in order
>  to move forward to an "if and how" of establishing what every review
>  group or committee has already concluded is needed, yesterday.
>  
>  Following this recommendation will kill an IDNH constituency for at
>  least, 18 months.
>  
>  
>  Perhaps there should be more respect for the working groups, better
>  procedures and more education for all in this regard.
>  
>  Sincerely,
>  
>  --
>  This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>  Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>  ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>  Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html