FW: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

Forwarding as this was obviously intended for the list.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy Harris [mailto:sandy@storm.ca]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:27 PM
To: dassa@dhs.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.


Dassa wrote:
> 
> |>-----Original Message-----
> |>From: On Behalf Of Joanna Lane
> |>Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:20 AM
> |>Subject: RE: [wg-review] Resumption of Review.
> |
> |>TO ALL:  Is there anybody left on this ML.  Please respond
> |>with a simple YES if you are still interested in the "work" of the WG-Review.
> |>
> 
> YES, still here and participating.

I'm still here, though I'm not convinced there's much point. The original
deadline was 15 Jan. There was confusion about whether it was extended to
20 Feb.

If this group continues and produces some new report, after 20 Feb, will the
Names Council or the board pay any attention?


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html