ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Proposal for a Public Policy Group Constituency


This seems to me an excellent idea. I completely agree with it.
Best regards,

Luca Muscarà

"Babybows.com" wrote:

>      As a member of the public, it has become increasingly clear to me that
> for a long time there has existed a sizable worldwide group of organizations
> actively pursuing improvements at ICANN for the benefit of the general
> public, a group that meets all the criteria for Constituency
> representation - a Public Policy Group.  These organizations have been
> responsible for spearheading legislative actions, for ensuring a necessary
> level of congressional oversight, for thorough research and analysis into
> matters that affect the global Internet community.  It is time for such a
> Constituency, a group committed to working hard to bring about necessary
> change; this will serve the best interests of the Corporation.
>      I ask for comments on this proposal.  I ask for help in developing a
> plan of action.  I ask for help in identifying these organizations, and in
> drafting a letter of outreach to entice them to formally enter into the
> ICANN fold.
>
> Best regards to all members still participating,
> Danny Younger
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>