Re: [wg-review] Trademarks and UDRP

["Miles B. Whitener" <mbw@i-theta.com>]

Oh great.  More analogies.
I've noticed a pattern in this group.  Analogies.  Always.
I have a bit of advice for you: if you are really trying to tell
the truth, and it's not about a metaphysical matter, then just
speak the facts.
This advice might not help you much, though, because you seem
very confused.
Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Trademarks and UDRP


> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 06:54:00PM +1100, Dassa wrote:
> > One of the things that have always confused me was why
trademark
> > issues were ever allowed to enter into formation of the
domain policies.
>
> There is no mystery at all.  When the Internet became a
commercial
> medium, domain names had an impact on TM holders.
>
> Suppose you and I were neighbors in a housing tract on a hill
> overlooking San Francisco Bay.  We both paid a premium because
we had
> "view lots".  You are a little uphill, and behind me.
> ...


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html