RE: [wg-review] Proposal for a Public Policy Group Constituency

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Luca Muscarà wrote:
>
> This seems to me an excellent idea. I completely agree with it.
> Best regards,
>
> Luca Muscarà
>
> "Babybows.com" wrote:
>
> >      As a member of the public, it has become increasingly clear to me
that
> > for a long time there has existed a sizable worldwide group of
organizations
> > actively pursuing improvements at ICANN for the benefit of the general
> > public, a group that meets all the criteria for Constituency
> > representation - a Public Policy Group.  These organizations have been
> > responsible for spearheading legislative actions, for ensuring a
necessary
> > level of congressional oversight, for thorough research and analysis
into
> > matters that affect the global Internet community.  It is time for such
a
> > Constituency, a group committed to working hard to bring about necessary
> > change; this will serve the best interests of the Corporation.

Sandy Harris wrote:-
Absolutely!

- I support this proposal also.
Joanna Lane


> >      I ask for comments on this proposal.  I ask for help in developing
a
> > plan of action.  I ask for help in identifying these organizations, and
in
> > drafting a letter of outreach to entice them to formally enter into the
> > ICANN fold.
--

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html