Re: [wg-review] Trademarks and UDRP

[Andrew Moulden <andrew@FoolStop.com>]

At 13:43 22/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>"Stabilize" is not a legal term I am familiar with. If what is meant is
>consistency or precendent setting opinions, it is doubtful that this will
>be achieved through "private law making arbitration" until the UDRP (or
>its successor) is clear, sensible, and reflects the values free
>expression.
>
>Rod

My contention exactly, and one of the reasons why I balked at the statement 
made by Kent, one obvious corollary of which is that provided the UDRP is 
applied in a consistently unfair manner, it is a satisfactory system!

Regards,
Andrew

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html