Re: [wg-review] WG process timetable and procedure

[Eric Dierker <Eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Dear Mr. Sheppard,

Thank you for your missive.  Would you mind telling us what it means.  As an
exceptional display of desire to placate would you allow our use of this list
through the 6th of March.  The idea being we could marshall our thoughts through
that time and present something coherent in Melbourne.
I presumptively speak in absence of our chair......

Sincerely,  With hat in hand on bended knee.

To We Wg:

Would someone ask the GA for use of their list while we finish.  I assume Danny
will continue his vigil.  I now ask you to come forward with topics.  Assuming
responsibility which is always forthcoming let us submit to whoever may go to
Melbourne.

Ultreya,

Sotiris, Joanna, Danny, Dassa, Erica, Eric, Jefsey, Rod, Marcia, Marilyn, Phil,
Andrew, Joop Philip, Rob, Karl, Cindy, Frupp, bukko, Gold, Kent, William,
Bret, Andy, Greg, Miles, YJ, Sandy, Adam, David, Luca

Ah man if I forgot you don't make me gravel(sp) just help out to show all of the
rest of them you will try to take care of them.

Philip Sheppard wrote:

> IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR WORKING GROUP REVIEW
> Future timetable for the groups input
>
> Status
> 1. The DNSO comment period on the draft DNSO Review Report v. 2.0a ended
> February 11th.
>
> Next steps
> 2. Comments submitted from WG Review and others has been incorporated as
> appropriate by the chair of the Names Council Review Task Force (NCRTF) into
> a draft version 3.  NCRTF comprises one representative from each of the
> seven NC constituencies. Version 3 has been validated by remaining members
> of the NCRTF.
>
> 3. DNSO Review Report version 3 was received 18 February by the ICANN Board.
> This is in preparation for the Board's meeting in March in Melbourne and to
> allow full time for an ICANN public comment period.
>
> 4. As was mandated, the task of the Names Council Review Task Force,
> including a DNSO public comment period, is now complete.
>
> 5. In order to ensure coherent input to the ICANN Board, all further
> comments from WG Review should be directed to the ICANN public comment
> website, when the ICANN public comment period begins.
>
> 6. At the closure of the ICANN public comment period the task of WG Review
> will be complete.
>
> Implementation
> 7. The Names Council will be reviewing both the input from the final WG D
> report and from the Review process to develop a new process to implement the
> recommendations of the Review process. Full participation in this
> implementation phase is envisaged. It is understood that the structure of
> participation will be an improvement on the present structure of DNSO
> working groups!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Theresa Swinehart, Chair, DNSO Review Task Force
> Philip Sheppard, NC Chair
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html