Re: [wg-review] WG Review process timetable and procedure

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

I join in Mr. Younger's frustration, however I do know the intentions of the
council well enough to assert blame.  I believe Mr. Sheppard's efforts are a
beginning toward accepting accountability.  Once there is full accountability
there will be progress or I should say more progress.  Education is crucial
here.  I am not referring to the masses, but to the council and this group as
examples.  Mr. Youngers' letter is quite educational regarding productivity and
participation. I believe that these facts make it quite clear that any report we
give must be unequivocal.

The management and staffing infrastructure of all of ICANN is innadequate.  As
my old business management professor like to say, "if you want to make a company
fail design it like Mr. Dierkers'".

Sincerely,

"Babybows.com" wrote:

> We would like to thank Philip Sheppard for taking the time from his busy
> schedule to provide the Review Working Group with his vision of the future,
> a future in which developing better means of participation is a key
> objective.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html