Re: [wg-review] Re:APPEAL OF 2/27/01

["eric Jonvel" <ejonvel@ej.net>]

I concur.

Eric Jonvel
France.

>  > Pursuant to the adoption of the DRAFT Rules of Procedure for the DNSO
Names
>  > Council, v2 on February 26, wherein it is stipulated that, "Any of the
>  > following persons can make proposals for NC agenda items by e-mail to
>  > nc-intake@dnso.org :," and that such persons include "members of the
General
>  > Assembly (GA) defined as subscribers to the ga@dnso.org,
announce@dnso.org
>  > or the GA voting register", and whereas I, Danny Younger, as a member
of
>  > Review Working Group and as an individual listed in the GA voting
register,
>  > meet the above criteria, I make the following proposal for an NC agenda
>  > item:  Reconsideration of the Timeline of the Review Working Group - an
>  > amendment to Decision D2.
>  >
>
>  As a member of both the GA and this working group I concur in this formal
>  appeal.
>  I also ask all members still monitoring to contribute to preparing a
further
>  report to be presented in Melbourne.  With this appeal as an example I
disclose
>  that I do not agree with all of what is written here, but I will stand
behind it
>  fully as opposed to failure to act and appear with less than a united
opinion.
>
>  If you concur in this position simply use the header and write concur. To
keep
>  traffic down and for ease do not address anything further on the
response. Let
>  us make it simple to calculate. If you have a need to discuss the issue
please
>  use Babybows' original header.
>
>  Sincerely,


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html