<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Trademarks and UDRP
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:58:04AM -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
> If my stockholders of my fictitious company found out that I (as a fictitious
> lawyer) on behalf of my company signed an agreement that said I would agree and
> abide by the decisions of wipo regarding our domain names and trademarks they
> would fire me.
Mistake #1: You don't "abide by the decisions of WIPO". You abide by
the decisions of an independent arbitrator.
Mistake #2: People sign arbitration agreements all the time. They are
quite common. Nobody would fire you for signing an arbitration
agreement.
> Now the only way they would not fire me is if I had no choice and could wink at
> them and say don't worry we control wipo.
Sorry, but you are simply being ridiculous. You are misrepresenting (or
misunderstand) the UDRP, you are misrepresenting (or misunderstand) the
nature of arbitration, you are misrepresenting (or misunderstand) the
nature of WIPO.
In short, you are merely mouthing words because you like their sound.
There is no actual content.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|