Re: [wg-review] DNSO recommendations

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

All,

Broadly speaking, I believe it is possible to
identify the following general Topics of Interest
with reference to proposals/recommendations
relating to the process/structure of the DNSO
(please bear in mind that the list is loosely
based on the discussions within this WG to date
and is not to be understood as
comprehensive/exhaustive):

1) Those in favour of abolition of Constituency
structure altogether with
	a)a reintegration into an undefined mass GA
electorate or,
	b)a restructuring into a Constituency
organization along ccTLD lines (i.e. national) or,
	c)a reformulation into a representative,
two-level parliamentary organization.
2) Those in favour of the Status Quo within the
DNSO.
3) Those in favour of modifications to the
existing structure (i.e. creation of additional
Constituencies to be grafted into the current
organization) without much change to the overall
structure.
4) Those in favour of a restructuring of the DNSO
as a whole, according to a novel set of
procedures/principles.

If anyone has any comments/corrections on these
divisions, and/or any additions to make to this
list, please feel free to post your suggestions. 
I am merely trying to set up a structure which
will help to identify and facilitate pertinent
topics of discussion which may aid us in the
formulation of as wide an array of considerations
as possible.

Regards,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
	Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html