Re: [wg-review] DNSO recommendations

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Joop Teernstra wrote:
> 
> At 01:31 16/03/01 -0500, Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 
> >3) Those in favour of modifications to the
> >existing structure (i.e. creation of additional
> >Constituencies to be grafted into the current
> >organization) without much change to the overall
> >structure.
> 
> I think we had several sub-options here.
> a. adding an Individuals constituency (taking the NC to 24 seats)
> 
> b. making the GA itself into a constituency  (taking the NC to 24 seats)
> (Greg's proposal, which seemed to be somewhat shot down by the NC in
> Melbourne)

Thanks Joop,

Duly noted and copied.  I am hoping that we will
be able to collate and present the revised List on
Joanna's www.internetstakeholders.com web site,
provided she still has the appetite for WG
discussion. ;-)  Substantive comments with regards
to any of the proposals mentioned will also be
included in forthcoming comaprisons.

> 
> >4) Those in favour of a restructuring of the DNSO
> >as a whole, according to a novel set of
> >procedures/principles.
> >
> 
> c.  creating a super Name Holders constituency (9 seats), to be balanced by
> an ISP/IP/registrar/registry industry (9 seats) with an elected Chair as
> casting vote.
> There is much detail to be fleshed out for this option, first of all the
> agreement of the Business constituency.
> I hope to hear more from Marilyn, if she has discussed this option within
> her constituency.
> The Biz constituency is still struggling with an image that small
> businesses are not represented and being part of a Name Holders
> constituency would help.

Also noted.  Any input Marilyn may have with
regards to this proposal is definitely welcome,
particularly if it includes the sentiments of
other members of the Business Constituency.  

Regards,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
	Hermes Network, Inc.
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html