RE: [wg-review] DNSO recommendations

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I can support this.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jefsey Morfin [mailto:jefsey@wanadoo.fr]
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:55 AM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] DNSO recommendations
> 
> 
> The DNSO model I support is rather simple and not
> so different from the existing one - once the voting
> aspects have been changed.
> 
> 1. The DNSO is to be a Consultant to the BoD on DN
>      issues. Only DN holders should be allowed as members.
> 
> 2. The DNSO is made of the GA.
> 
> 3. The GA Members may create Special Interest Groups
>      of different kinds (Clubs, Interest Centers, Associations,
>      etc.. The existing Constituencies should stay unaffected
>      as SIGs.) SIGs may chose their own rules. Every declared
>      SIG (even not yet/no more acknowledged by the GA) has
>      a right to a DNSO mailing list and sub-site.
> 
> 4. The NC is a coordination list gathering SIG's Chairs.
>      Acceptation of SIG within the NC is voted by the GA
>      annually or at the demand of 10% of the GA Members.
> 
> 5. The BoD Members are elected by the GA. Nominations
>      must be seconded by the a certain number of NC
>      Members (so candidates are serious enough and
>      acknowledged by the community).  One of the
>      Directors elect will have to represent a ccTLDs.
> 
> 6. Chair and co-Chair of the GA are nominated by GA
>      Members and elected by GA Members.
> 
> 7. Reports to the BoD can be refused by the NC for poor
>      quality or lack of consensus. Such refusal shall call
>      on 2 vetoes by two GA accepted SIG.
> 
> 8. DNSO will be informed of every DN related issue and
>      commercial negotiation. No DN related decision will
>      be taken by the BoD without preceding conclusions
>      by the DNSO. Emergency decision will be possible,
>      but for a limited period of time.
> 
> Jefsey
> 
> 
> On 07:31 16/03/01, Sotiropoulos said:
> >All,
> >
> >Broadly speaking, I believe it is possible to
> >identify the following general Topics of Interest
> >with reference to proposals/recommendations
> >relating to the process/structure of the DNSO
> >(please bear in mind that the list is loosely
> >based on the discussions within this WG to date
> >and is not to be understood as
> >comprehensive/exhaustive):
> >
> >1) Those in favour of abolition of Constituency
> >structure altogether with
> >         a)a reintegration into an undefined mass GA
> >electorate or,
> >         b)a restructuring into a Constituency
> >organization along ccTLD lines (i.e. national) or,
> >         c)a reformulation into a representative,
> >two-level parliamentary organization.
> >2) Those in favour of the Status Quo within the
> >DNSO.
> >3) Those in favour of modifications to the
> >existing structure (i.e. creation of additional
> >Constituencies to be grafted into the current
> >organization) without much change to the overall
> >structure.
> >4) Those in favour of a restructuring of the DNSO
> >as a whole, according to a novel set of
> >procedures/principles.
> >
> >If anyone has any comments/corrections on these
> >divisions, and/or any additions to make to this
> >list, please feel free to post your suggestions.
> >I am merely trying to set up a structure which
> >will help to identify and facilitate pertinent
> >topics of discussion which may aid us in the
> >formulation of as wide an array of considerations
> >as possible.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >         Hermes Network, Inc.
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html