RE: [wg-review] Straw Poll - ML

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Hello Joanna,

I appreciate the thought and agree that WG-Review needs to be an on-going
process.

That said, I disagree that it can be effectivly kept open, long-term. It is
just too much against ICANN interests (for the current ruling party).


-----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 12:02 PM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-review] Straw Poll - ML
Sensitivity: Confidential


Option 1) WG-Review Mailing List should be closed on April 16th
Option 2) WG-Review Mailing List should be kept open

Please take the time to make your voice heard on this issue, by voting on
the ML and at the straw poll running at http://www.internetstakeholders.com.
.

Thank you,
Joanna
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html