RE: [wg-review] Representative Figures

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
|> Behalf Of Joop Teernstra
|> Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2001 11:27 AM
|> To: Jefsey Morfin; wg-review@dnso.org
|> Subject: Re: [wg-review] Representative Figures

|> It is also the reason why "independent" lists that convey a certain
|> consensus, such as the IDNO-discuss list (once ) and the NCDNHC list are
|> infiltrated by professional "neutralizers".

Joop, come out of the dream world you are inhabiting.  The IDNO-discuss list was
not infiltrated and the facts disprove all of your crackpot theories regarding
the IDNO being taken over by disruptive elements also.

But, even if such lists were/are infiltrated, it is not a problem.  Good list
rules and participation by interested parties can handle such matters.  If not,
the group did not have enough going for it in the first place and deserves what
ever results.

People quickly try to blame their own shortcomings on others.  A mailing list
invites participation from all as a rule, if an individual doesn't like the
comments of posters, an individual may always respond and post their own views.
As with all human communications, some will have louder voices and attempt to
dominate conversations.  As in f2f communications, we all have mechanisms for
dealing with such issues.  Mailing lists have the list rules.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html