ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Straw Poll [amendment]


on 4/12/01 9:11 PM, Sotiris at sotiris@hermesnetwork.com wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> If anybody understood the following question as anything other than a
> reference to a "dissolution" of the existing DNSO Constituency
> structure, I would be happy to void their original ballot, and accept a
> new submission.
> 
>> 2) The recommendation for "dissolution" of the DNSO should supercede
> the
>> recommendation calling for an Individual's Constituency at this point
> in
>> time.
> 
> To be honest, I didn't realize that I'd left out the "current structure"
> part.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Working Chair, WG Review
> 
I suggest this accounts for so many abstentians and would omit it from the
report as could be confusing.

Regards,
Joanna

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>