ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] Covering letter to WG-Review Report


Dear Sotiris and Joanna,

At 23:49 15/04/01 -0400, Sotiris wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.icann.org/general/white-paper-05jun98.htm.
>
>> Currently, individual domain name holders constitute a
>> functional group within the GA, but interested persons have
>> neither a mechanism for appeal, nor any way to voice their
>> concerns at a decision making level alongside other special
>> interest groups.
>
>Can we say "individuals constitute an outspoken functional group within the
>GA, but interested persons have
>neither a mechanism for appeal, nor any way to voice their concerns at a
>decision making level alongside other special interest groups?
>

I think Joanna is right to keep the link with the Domain Names. After all,
we are speaking about the GA  *of the DNSO*, not ICANN @large
representation of what the German Newspapers call "the surfers".



--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>