[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.



Dennis,

The Interim Report of Working Group C of the DNS is 36 pages long, and
a separate paper (also long) covers the Root Level Registry Rules.

In this instance, two weeks may be insufficient to adequately review such
a volume of information, whereas 10 weeks seems inordinately long. For
long documents such as this, I think 30 days is appropriate time.

Regards

Tony Harris
CABASE - Argentina
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dennis Jennings <Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie>
Para: council@dnso.org <council@dnso.org>
Fecha: Miércoles 17 de Noviembre de 1999 20:35
Asunto: RE: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C,
new gTLDs.


>Colleagues,
>
>I would be very interested in your comments on this e-mail.
>
>It is my understanding that several people and international groups have
>complained that there is no possibility of commenting on a set of documents
>like this in two weeks - I think 10 weeks has been mentioned as a
reasonable
>timescale.  (These complaints were (I think) in relation to ICANN documents
>rather than WG documents)
>
>I am particularly interested in hearing the views of the non US members of
the
>Names Council on this.
>
>Thanks
>Dennis
>
>--------------------------------
>Dennis Jennings
>Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie
>Phone:  +353 87 220 8225 (Mobile)
>Fax:  +353 1 495 1324
>
>On Wednesday, November 17, 1999 6:11 PM, DNSO Listadmin
>[SMTP:DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.org] wrote:
>>
>> [ To: council@dnso.org, wg-b, wg-c, wg-d, wg-e]
>> [ To: announce@dnso.org, ga@dnso.org]
>>
>> Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
>>
>> The WG-C Interim Report is open for two weeks public comments,
>> starting today November 17th, 1999, ending Wednesday, December 1th.
>>
>> All comments shall be sent to comments-gtlds@dnso.org, no later
>> no later than December 1th, 1999 (18:00 CET). Any mail sent to
>> any other e-mail address will not be considered.
>>
>> The full WG-C document is rather long and cannot be posted
>> in a simple email. It includes 7 position papers.
>>
>> Please read it at:
>>     http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19991023.NCwgc-report.html
>>
>> The full archives of the WG-C are on line at:
>>     http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/maillist.html
>>
>> The WG-C is co-chaired by Javier Sola, named by the NC (liaison
>> co-chair), and by Jonathan Weinberg, elected by the WG-C members
>> (working co-chair).
>>
>>
>> DNSO Secretariat
>