[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [council] GA Chair Nominations.DOC
Caroline,
Your summary is very good. I have one main comment regarding
consistency with dates in the "Call for nomination procedures" the NC
established and which is quoted on the main http://www.dnso.org/ page.
We have always Friday 18:00 CET as a border between actions:
Friday Nov 26, 18:00 CET -- call for nominations open
Friday Dec 10, 18:00 CET -- call for nominations close
Friday Dec 10, 18:00 CET -- the NC starts to discuss
Friday Dec 17, 18:00 CET -- decision of the NC published
whereas your proposal gives:
Friday Nov 26, 18:00 CET -- call for nominations open
Thursday Dec 2, 16:00 CET -- call for nominations close
Thursday Dec 2, 24:00 CET -- list of accepted nominees published
Thursday Dec 2, 17:00 CET -- call for endorsements open
Tuesday Dec 7, 16:00 CET -- call for endorsements close
(the NC starts just after and gives results on Friday Dec 17).
I would suggest the following date's adjustement:
Friday Nov 26, 18:00 CET -- call for nominations open
Friday Dec 3, 18:00 CET -- call for nominations close
Friday Dec 3, 24:00 CET -- list of accepted nominees published
Friday Dec 3, 18:00 CET -- call for endorsements open
Friday Dec 10, 18:00 CET -- call for endorsements close
Friday Dec 10, 24:00 CET -- list of nominees+endorsements published
(the NC starts just after and gives results on Friday Dec 17).
Explanation:
- we will avoid criticism about differents hours
- we will avoid criticism about shortened time, less than a week,
for nominations and endorsements
- the list for nominations: ga-nominations@dnso.org is different
from the list for endorsement: ga-endorsements@dnso.org, and
therefore it is not difficult to have the same hour as a limit
I believe (experience of the NC vote for ICANN BoD) it is necessary
to write up front that the messages sent to ga-nominations@dnso.org
and ga-endorsements@dnso.org are processed manually (approved manually).
Both lists are de facto open to anybody and besides fraudulent posts
may be targetted by spams or by spoofing.
Caroline's summary hopefully provides templates
for posting to that lists, therefore we have a very clear situation:
- the rule for accepting messages by the DNSO Secretariat
is a conformity to a template and this procedures
(the non-accepted messages are re-sent to the watchdog
for decision)
- the watchdog commitee is in charge of detection of fraudulent
posts
Elisabeth
>
> Nomination Procedures for the Chair of the General Assembly (GA)
>
>
> 1. The nominations period shall take place starting November 26,
> 1999 at 18:00 Central European Time (CET) through 16:00 CET, December =
> 2,
> 1999.
>
> 2. Any member of the GA may make a nomination.
>
> A member of the GA shall be any natural person who at the time of the
> nomination (or endorsement as set forth below) is:
> (a) subscribed to the GA or GA-announce lists;
> (b) subscribed to a working group list; or
> (c) a member of a DNSO Constituency.
> Note: A person with multiple email addresses is only
> counted once.
>
> 3. Nominations should be emailed to the DNSO Secretariat at the
> following email address: [Elisabeth, please fill in]. The nomination
> should include at least the following information:
> (a) the name and email address of the nominee,=20
> (b) the name and email address of the nominator, and
> (c) type of GA membership (i.e., GA subscriber,
> GA-announce subscriber, Working Group subscriber, or DNSO Constituency
> member).
> 4. Any nominee has until 16:00 CET on December 2, 1999 in which to
> accept the nomination. Acceptances should be emailed to the DNSO
> Secretariat at the following email address: [Elisabeth, please fill in]
> and should include at least the following information:
> (a) the name and email address of the nominee,=20
> (b) background information about the nominee, and=20
> (c) a statement of the nominee's objectives in the
> role as Chair of the GA (including his or her views of the role of the
> GA and its relationship with the Names Council and Constituencies of =
> the
> DNSO). =20
> A list of the accepted nominees shall be posted at the
> following email address no later than 24:00 CET on December 2, 1999
> [Elisabeth, please fill in].
> 5. Starting at 17:00 CET, December 2, 1999 and up until 16:00 CET
> on December 7, 1999, any member of the GA may endorse their support for
> any of the accepted nominees. Endorsements should be emailed to the
> DNSO Secretariat at the following email address: [Elisabeth, please
> fill in]. The endorsement should include at least the following
> information:
> (1) the name and email address of the endorser; and
> (2) the name of the accepted nominee he or she
> wishes to endorse. =20
> Specific statements of endorsements (i.e., how you know
> the nominee and why you believe he or she would make a good GA Chair)
> may also be submitted and are encouraged. Members of the GA may =
> endorse
> as many accepted nominees as they wish, but may only endorse any given
> accepted nominee once. While the Names Council will consider the =
> number
> of endorsements for each accepted nominee as valuable input into the
> selection process, given the potential for abuse in an online process,
> such numbers will not be definitive.
> 6. All accepted nominees that receive 10 or more endorsements by
> 16:00 CET on December 7, 1999 shall be forwarded to the Names Council
> for selection.
> 7. A nomination watchdog committee shall be formed to police the
> nomination process to help detect and cure any instances of fraudulent
> activity in connection with the nomination process. The committee =
> shall
> consists of the authors of the nominations procedures proposals
> submitted to the GA, which includes Jonathan Weinberg, Kent Crispin,
> Javier Rodriguez, Roberto Gaetano and Bradley Thorton. Any instances =
> of
> fraudulent nominations or endorsements should be reported to this
> committee at the following email address: [Elisabeth, fill in], with a
> copy to the Names Council at council@dnso.org. This committee and the
> Names Council shall have the sole discretion as to how to deal with any
> such reported activity.
>
>