[council] From Michael Palage, re WG-B

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

> From mpalage@infonetworks.com Thu May 11 14:53 MET 2000
> From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>
> To: "Elisabeth Porteneuve" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Subject: RE: WG-B report, end of three weeks public comments
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 08:57:45 -0400
> Message-ID: <LOBBIFBLMBPOJGEKGEPHCEDMDAAA.mpalage@infonetworks.com>
> 
> Dear Elisabeth:
> 
> I will be preparing the revised final report this weekend in anticipation of
> the NC's next teleconference scheduled for the 17th. Therefore, I have no
> objection to an extra day or two but my final report will be submitted next
> Monday. That deadline cannot be moved.
> 
> Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 1:49 AM
> To: mpalage@infonetworks.com
> Subject: Fwd: WG-B report, end of three weeks public comments
> 
> I forgot a cc !
> 
> > From porteneu Thu May 11 07:45:24 2000
> > To: council@dnso.org
> > Subject: WG-B report, end of three weeks public comments
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Names Council members,
> 
> As you recall from the last teleconference, the WG-B Formal Report
> was open for three weeks public comments, starting 19 April 2000,
> ending 10 May 2000 (yesterday), see details in:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20000419.NCwgb-comments.html
> 
> Yesterday the NC received one request for extension of time from the NCDNH.
> 
> All public comments received to comments-wgb@dnso.org are archived in:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-wgb/Arc00/maillist.html
> 
> As of today CET early morning, 85 comments were received, see names
> of senders and the subjects below.
> A review and compilation of these comments is necessary prior
> to the next NC teleconference, foreseen on 17 May, I believe
> it remains within Chair's and Co-Chair's prerogative.
> 
> I am cc'ing Michael Palage.
> 
> Best,
> Elisabeth
> 
<snip>