[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[council] WG-B report, end of three weeks public comments





Dear Names Council members,

As you recall from the last teleconference, the WG-B Formal Report
was open for three weeks public comments, starting 19 April 2000,
ending 10 May 2000 (yesterday), see details in:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20000419.NCwgb-comments.html

Yesterday the NC received one request for extension of time from the NCDNH.

All public comments received to comments-wgb@dnso.org are archived in:
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-wgb/Arc00/maillist.html

As of today CET early morning, 85 comments were received, see names
of senders and the subjects below.
A review and compilation of these comments is necessary prior
to the next NC teleconference, foreseen on 17 May, I believe
it remains within Chair's and Co-Chair's prerogative.

I am cc'ing Michael Palage.

Best,
Elisabeth

------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.	[comments-wgb] Feedback, Working Group B 
*	From: "Jim Fellers" <jf55115@wt.net>

2.	[comments-wgb] TM and a Domain Name (Are they the same?) 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

3.	[comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

4.	No Subject 
*	From: Mihm Michael W <MihmMichaelW@JDCORP.deere.com>

5.	[comments-wgb] Trademark Owners Rights/Cyber Squatters 
*	From: "SS Steve Scharf (1368)" <Steve.Scharf@amgreetings.com>

6.	[comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20 
*	From: "J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>

7.	[comments-wgb] ServiceMaster Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal 
*	From: Douglas_W._Colber@svm.com

8.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise plus Twenty proposal 
*	From: "Ron Greigg" <rgreigg@ix.netcom.com>

9.	[comments-wgb] (no subject) 
*	From: Jose Gomez-Marquez <jose@home.com>

10.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: "Serge Hadji" <Serge.Hadji@trw.com>

11.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: "Sandi L Colello" <Sandi.L.Colello@trw.com>

12.	[comments-wgb] Domain names 
*	From: "Lies, Otto R." <Otto.R.Lies@sgcna.com>

13.	[comments-wgb] Response to Sunrise Proposal 
*	From: "Juan Roberto Gonzalez" <jgonzalez@swlaw.edu>

14.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal 
*	From: Brinton Scott <BScott@dentonwildesapte.com.cn>

15.	[comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks (2) 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

16.	[comments-wgb] Objection to "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal 
*	From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>

17.	[comments-wgb] Definition of "Famous" and Expansion of Mark Holders' Rights Should Be Carefully Limited 
*	From: Robert Szarka <szarka@downcity.net>

18.	[comments-wgb] *Sunrise Plus Twenty* 
*	From: "Palmer, Lynne" <Lynne.Palmer@ecolab.com>

19.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: druckmr@nytimes.com

20.	[comments-wgb] ICANN - Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal 
*	From: "Jeanne E Oneill" <jonei2@jcpenney.com>

21.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: Steve Price <srprice@pacbell.net>

22.	[comments-wgb] Comments to Sunrise+20 Proposal 
*	From: "Gundelfinger, Anne" <anne.gundelfinger@intel.com>

23.	[comments-wgb] AIPLA Comments to Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal 
*	From: "Jonathan Hudis" <JHUDIS@oblon.com>

24.	[comments-wgb] INTA Comments on WG-B 
*	From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>

25.	[comments-wgb] ATTENTION: I Believe something is afoul here....Please Read... 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

26.	[comments-wgb] Forget sunrise - dnso as trademark police? 
*	From: "Ken Cowan" <kccowan@starpower.net>

27.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty 
*	From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>

28.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty 
*	From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>

29.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Pluse Twenty 
*	From: "Shannon Gallagher" <gallaghers@PENNIE.COM>

30.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal 
*	From: "Hallie, Michelena" <Michelena.Hallie@viacom.com>

31.	[comments-wgb] support the Sunrise 
*	From: "Rose, Nick" <npr@ffwlaw.com>

32.	[comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise" proposal 
*	From: Jeff Fisher <jeff@jeffenstein.org>

33.	[comments-wgb] .WEB (important) 
*	From: flex@holonet.net

34.	[comments-wgb] I oppose "Sunrise + 20". 
*	From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)

35.	[comments-wgb] What happens to TM holders with the same name, but different class of goods or s 
*	From: "greg krajewski" <udomain@mailcity.com>

36.	[comments-wgb] I am opposed to "Sunrise Plus Twenty" 
*	From: "Blair P. Houghton" <bph@primenet.com>

37.	[comments-wgb] Afternic.com Members Forum Please add my name to the list 
*	From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>

38.	[comments-wgb] .Web 
*	From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

39.	[comments-wgb] ICANN has no mandate for the Sunrise +20 rule 
*	From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>

40.	[comments-wgb] I oppose Sunrise + 20 
*	From: David Schutt <david@speco.com>

41.	[comments-wgb] Fwd: .WEB (please read) 
*	From: DNSO Webmaster <DNSO.Webmaster@dnso.org>

42.	[comments-wgb] The Realistic .Web 
*	From: "hawk" <first2web@alltel.net>

43.	[comments-wgb] .web WILL replace the dying .com's...it's a fact...get over it.. 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

44.	[comments-wgb] position on the issues 
*	From: "Judith Oppenheimer" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>

45.	[comments-wgb] The not so Famous Marks 
*	From: Jack Landrum <jlandrum@consultant.com>

46.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: rwhoke@mmm.com

47.	[comments-wgb] RE: New TLD's considered 
*	From: Whirlwindjr@aol.com

48.	[comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B 
*	From: "Anthony Galimberti" <Anthony@EnterpriseSolutionProviders.on.ca>

49.	[comments-wgb] Response to Working Group B Formal Report 
*	From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>

50.	[comments-wgb] gTLD's 
*	From: "Nick Cunningham" <nick_cunningham@wragge.com>

51.	[comments-wgb] Intellectual Property Constituency's proposal to ICANN about trade marks and the new gTLDs 
*	From: "Andrew Margiotta-mills (FCHD)" <andrew.margiotta-mills@freethcartwright.co.uk>

52.	[comments-wgb] "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal 
*	From: "Huguenin,Charles-AndrŽ,VEVEY,FC-JUR/TM" <Charles-Andre.Huguenin@nestle.com>

53.	[comments-wgb] We support Sunrise Plus 20 
*	From: KHS@de-vi.com

54.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Proposal Plus Twenty 
*	From: "David Moyer-DM" <moyer.dm@pg.com>

55.	[comments-wgb] Support for "Sunrise + 20" Proposal 
*	From: "M.J.P. Deans" <mjpdeans@btinternet.com>

56.	[comments-wgb] Trademark Protection is the responsiblity of the court system!! 
*	From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>

57.	[comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal 
*	From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>

58.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision 
*	From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>

59.	[comments-wgb] Why bother with the obsolete legacy roots anyway? 
*	From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <bthornton@jointtech.com>

60.	[comments-wgb] Working Group B Report 
*	From: Stu Benson <sbenson@farkaslaw.com>

61.	[comments-wgb] Support of Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: "Ettinger, Patrice" <Patrice.Ettinger@dowjones.com>

62.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: "Patricia Hoet" <PHoet@hpcd-abogados.com>

63.	[comments-wgb] Interesting - non-commercial Constituency Position Paper 
*	From: "Loh Shin Shion" <ssloh@ew.mimos.my>

64.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20-proposal 
*	From: kuntze@boehmert.de

65.	[comments-wgb] Comments on the WG-B (Famous and Well-known Marks) Report 
*	From: azkubo@interlink.or.jp

66.	[comments-wgb] RE:Comments about the WG-B Report 
*	From: KMPA4244@jpo-miti.go.jp

67.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20 is good, but . . . 
*	From: "Peter Gustav Olson" <pgo@ipb.dk>

68.	[comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B 
*	From: "Anthony Galimberti" <anthony@enterprisesolutionproviders.on.ca>

69.	[comments-wgb] test 
*	From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>

70.	[comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20 
*	From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>

71.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal 
*	From: "Michael K. Kirk" <Mkirk@aipla.org>

72.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus twenty proposal 
*	From: "Peter Broadbent" <pbroadbent@cblaw.com>

73.	[comments-wgb] FW: Sunrise Plus 20 
*	From: "Boulware, Margaret A." <MBoulware@jenkens.com>

74.	[comments-wgb] Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal 
*	From: Neal Greenfield <neal.greenfield@imagelock.com>

75.	[comments-wgb] MPA comments on the WGB Formal Report - support for sunrise 
*	From: "Shapiro, Ted" <Ted_Shapiro@MPAA.org>

76.	[comments-wgb] Legality of Sunrise: A Response 
*	From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>

77.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise 20 Proposal 
*	From: dianne.harrington@kodak.com

78.	[comments-wgb] On the creation of new gTLDs 
*	From: Seann Hallisky <Halliss@cojk.com>

79.	[comments-wgb] Time Warner Inc.'s Comments Regarding Sunrise Plus Twenty Pro posa l 
*	From: "Wilson, Dennis L." <DWILSON@KMWLAW.COM>

80.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision 
*	From: "Candido, Domna" <candido@MajorLeagueBaseball.com>

81.	[comments-wgb] On the Sunrise Proposal 
*	From: Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>

82.	[comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty 
*	From: "Andrew Gray" <graya@PENNIE.COM>

83.	[comments-wgb] Support to "very limited" sunrise period. 
*	From: Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>

84.	[comments-wgb] Comments to Working Group B Report 
*	From: DBUSH2@aol.com

85.	[comments-wgb] Words First 
*	From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>

------------------------------------------------------------------------