Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21

["Zakaria AMAR" <zakaria@univ-nkc.mr>]

Ken,

I will not be able to attend this week also.

Regards

On 18 Sep 00, at 10:36, Ken Stubbs wrote:

From:           	"Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>
To:             	"Digitel - Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>, <cchicoine@dkwlaw.com>
Copies to:      	"names council" <council@dnso.org>,
       	"Andrew McLaughlin" <mclaughlin@pobox.com>,
       	"Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>
Subject:        	Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21
Date sent:      	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:36:25 -0400

> your right caroline... there are no surprises here........ but there
> has also been little or no discussion here on the list and this
> frankly troubles me.
> 
> i was just trying to stimulate some deeper involvement and hopefully
> provide some dialogue & suggestions prior to the next teleconference.
> as i said, i had no suggestions from snyone except yj on potential
> agenda items for this teleconference until i posted a tentative
> agenda.
> 
> this implies to me that, even though members are aware of an upcoming
> teleconference, it is not very high on the list of priorities for
> them. trying to develop more interest and discussion in advance is a
> bit of a frustrating task. i was hoping that we could generate a bit
> more enthusiasm by delaying a week  (especially hopeful about more
> input from every constituancy regarding the DNSO review process)
> 
> as of right now i have 3 of the 19 members who have responded to me
> who said 1. cant make it but see no problem in delaying it one week 2.
> cant make 2nd and really dont want delay 3. cant make 2nd date and
> dont want delay
> 
> does that mean that all 15 others will definitely make the 28th or
> what ! how many are not going to be abvle to make this weeks
> teleconference if we keep the original date ?
> 
> does someone want to provide a bridge for the conference regardless of
> which date?
> 
> ken
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <cchicoine@dkwlaw.com>
> To: Digitel - Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> Cc: names council <council@dnso.org>; Andrew McLaughlin
> <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; <owner-council@dnso.org>; Louis Touton
> <touton@icann.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21
> 
> 
> >
> > As you may recall we set this date a while ago so that people could
> > better plan their schedules, and in fact part of the intake
> > committees recommendations is to have a schedule of the meetings in
> > advance so people can plan better.  I will not be available the
> > 28th.
> >
> > More importantly, however, I do not think anything on your proposed
> > agenda should be a surprise to anyone.  Moreover, if the need for
> > the
> postponement
> > is to promote a better discussion, before you postpone, I would like
> > to
> see
> > a commitment from the parties involved (budget committee, DNSO
> > review committee, outreach) that they will have a report for us no
> > later than
> this
> > Friday.
> >
> >
> >


Zakaria AMAR, Ph.D
IT Department 
University of Mauritania - 
Po. Box 620 - Nouakchott-
Tel: 222 25 28 39 (Office)
     222 29 11 57 (Home)
     222 25 37 33 (Fax)