Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21

["Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>]

I would prefer to have the tel conf THIS week rather than next simply because we need to
stimulate dialogue.... there is alot to do and time is short and ICANN would probably welcome
our input as we would theirs....

Best

Paul.

Zakaria AMAR wrote:

> Ken,
>
> I will not be able to attend this week also.
>
> Regards
>
> On 18 Sep 00, at 10:36, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> From:                   "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>
> To:                     "Digitel - Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>, <cchicoine@dkwlaw.com>
> Copies to:              "names council" <council@dnso.org>,
>         "Andrew McLaughlin" <mclaughlin@pobox.com>,
>         "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>
> Subject:                Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21
> Date sent:              Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:36:25 -0400
>
> > your right caroline... there are no surprises here........ but there
> > has also been little or no discussion here on the list and this
> > frankly troubles me.
> >
> > i was just trying to stimulate some deeper involvement and hopefully
> > provide some dialogue & suggestions prior to the next teleconference.
> > as i said, i had no suggestions from snyone except yj on potential
> > agenda items for this teleconference until i posted a tentative
> > agenda.
> >
> > this implies to me that, even though members are aware of an upcoming
> > teleconference, it is not very high on the list of priorities for
> > them. trying to develop more interest and discussion in advance is a
> > bit of a frustrating task. i was hoping that we could generate a bit
> > more enthusiasm by delaying a week  (especially hopeful about more
> > input from every constituancy regarding the DNSO review process)
> >
> > as of right now i have 3 of the 19 members who have responded to me
> > who said 1. cant make it but see no problem in delaying it one week 2.
> > cant make 2nd and really dont want delay 3. cant make 2nd date and
> > dont want delay
> >
> > does that mean that all 15 others will definitely make the 28th or
> > what ! how many are not going to be abvle to make this weeks
> > teleconference if we keep the original date ?
> >
> > does someone want to provide a bridge for the conference regardless of
> > which date?
> >
> > ken
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <cchicoine@dkwlaw.com>
> > To: Digitel - Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net>
> > Cc: names council <council@dnso.org>; Andrew McLaughlin
> > <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; <owner-council@dnso.org>; Louis Touton
> > <touton@icann.org>
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: [council] upcoming teleconference thursday september 21
> >
> >
> > >
> > > As you may recall we set this date a while ago so that people could
> > > better plan their schedules, and in fact part of the intake
> > > committees recommendations is to have a schedule of the meetings in
> > > advance so people can plan better.  I will not be available the
> > > 28th.
> > >
> > > More importantly, however, I do not think anything on your proposed
> > > agenda should be a surprise to anyone.  Moreover, if the need for
> > > the
> > postponement
> > > is to promote a better discussion, before you postpone, I would like
> > > to
> > see
> > > a commitment from the parties involved (budget committee, DNSO
> > > review committee, outreach) that they will have a report for us no
> > > later than
> > this
> > > Friday.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> Zakaria AMAR, Ph.D
> IT Department
> University of Mauritania -
> Po. Box 620 - Nouakchott-
> Tel: 222 25 28 39 (Office)
>      222 29 11 57 (Home)
>      222 25 37 33 (Fax)